
A strong identifying marker of hipsters is their affinity for listening to independent music; anything unknown in the mainstream. This penchant for rejecting the mainstream and being “in the know” about up-and-coming music carries over into other areas of taste and thought, with a marker of hipsterism being that there is value in having unspoken knowledge that those outside the subculture cannot possibly understand. Essential to the “knowing” is the practice of slang or outright language invention that increases the likelihood that no outsiders will gain that forbidden fruit of knowledge.
Hipsters tend to live in impoverished neighborhoods in urban areas, which when combined with their thrift-store mode of dress, mysterious “knowing” and rejection of anything mainstream, lends them an aura of bohemianism. But their lack of commitment to any unifying cause brands their bohemianism as false and contrived. Perhaps Gawker expresses it best with the term “fauxhemian” as quoted by Mark Greif in his article entitled, “What Was the Hipster?”.

"A strong identifying marker of hipsters is their affinity for listening to independent music; anything unknown in the mainstream. This penchant for rejecting the mainstream and being “in the know” about up-and-coming music carries over into other areas of taste and thought, with a marker of hipsterism being that there is value in having unspoken knowledge that those outside the subculture cannot possibly understand. "
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting thought to me. If knowledge plays an essential role in hip (which I think it does), then who is the creator of this knowledge? Do this knowledge form organically, or is there someone(s) who push this knowledge?