Friday, April 29, 2011

Just About Time to Say Good-bye


We’ve just about reached the end of the road for this semester, and it’s time for one last blog post! In this post I let you know my top three blog posts for the semester, and I give my final reflection on the class.

My top three blog posts are:


This post was our second assigned blog post. In this post we were required to write our own personal ethos.  This is my statement of how a person should live their life, what they should value, whom they should scorn, what to question, and how to act “rightly” in the world.


This post was a free post but was written in response to Scott’s “suggestion” in class that we should examine Hemingway’s “The Killers” for elements of hip. In this post, I analyzed this short story for references to time, knowledge, and identity.


This post was a free post in response to Scott’s suggestion that we might want to post a copy of our first essay in its entirety. I posted my essay, along with a disclaimer that I wasn’t entirely happy with the finished product.

I selected these three posts as some of my best work this semester because I feel that they exemplify good writing in general, and good writing for the web, specifically. In each of these posts, I worked really hard to make sure that I hit the target set up in the assignment. I did this by carefully reading each assignment to see what elements were required, and then I wrote based on those elements. When done with the writing, I critically read each piece to make sure that I had answered the questions posed, instead of getting off track on one of the many rabbit trails that present themselves whenever I begin to write. I made sure that I employed the guidelines provided about best practices for writing on the web, including making use of photos and/or graphic elements, keeping paragraphs short, writing for scannability, making good use of topic sentences to hook the reader, and just generally producing a post that was pleasing to the eye. Though I don’t feel that the essay post made for a great blog post from the standpoint that it wasn’t written specifically for the web (though I did try to make my intro for the post web-worthy), I include it as some of my best work because I ended up being really proud of that piece once it was finished. (It didn’t hurt a bit that a couple of my friends told me it could easily be used as a eulogy at my subject’s funeral someday!)

I’m not sure that my ideas of American pop culture have necessarily changed since the beginning of the semester. Though I necessarily live within it, I really had never given much thought to its effect on me. Mostly, I recognized that trends tend to repeat themselves, and I still feel that way. The idea that “everything old is new again” runs pretty deep within me. What I have gained from this course is an appreciation of the forces that shape American pop culture. It has been interesting to learn about the racial roots of “hipness”, and to recognize that being “out there” and bucking the status quo actually has become the status quo, in a manner of speaking. I still struggle with the idea of a constant present because I simply cannot disconnect my logical mind from the habit of seeing that present actions will have a monumental impact on the future. However, I can see how this idea is a great mechanism for capitalism, forcing an ever-present need for the “new and improved” product without the realization that in the near future it will be obsolete.

I worked hard in this class this semester to be a good participant in order to benefit the other students and to gain insight into the thought processes of others. I also worked hard to produce writing that would meet expectations as presented in assignments. I believe my strengths as a writer and thinker are analyzing the information presented and drawing conclusions between related points. I also like to try to put my own biases aside and view issues from the other vantage. I would venture to say that my weaknesses surface in the inability to be as concise as I would like to be in my writing. Trying to put the idea of “less is more” into practice can be difficult for me when writing.

I think that anything worth doing is worth doing well, and that has been my approach to this class this semester. Since I attended class every time we met (is there a prize for perfect attendance?), did all the required reading, participated in discussions to the best of my ability, met deadlines for writing assignments and garnered top grades, I think my performance merits an “A” for the semester. I would hope that if I were to be given a “report card” for this class that one of my comments would be “a pleasure to have in class.”


Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Annotated Bibliography for Essay 3

Annotated Bibliography

Baldwin, Kristen. "The Accidental Movie Star." Entertainment Weekly 987 (2008): 20-26. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr. 2011. This article details Tina Fey’s unintentional route to appearances on the big screen, fulfilling multiple roles in life at once – mother, comedy writer, small screen actress and big screen actress. It also illuminates how female viewers can relate to her character on 30 Rock and she serves as a role model to many. I will use this information to support my point of how Tina Fey is shaping pop culture through her work.
Clark, Cindy. "Funny Lady Tina Fey Gets an 'SNL'-Style Salute." USA Today n.d.: Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr. 2011. This article details the Kennedy Center Mark Twain Prize for American Humor, which Tina Fey won in 2010. I may be able to use some of this information to support my claim of a long history of comedic accomplishment and a forecast for continuing this into the future.
Freydkin, Donna. "The Inimitable Tina Fey." USA Today n.d.: Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 18 Apr. 2011. This article discusses Tina Fey’s many life roles including comedy writer, actress, mother and non-fiction author. It also talks about her impressions of Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin impressions and how that made her a pop-culture staple. I plan to use this to explore how political satire can shape the political process.
Heffernan, Virginia. “Annals of Entertainment: Anchor Woman.” newyorker.com. The New Yorker. Condé Nast Digital. 3 November, 2003. Web. 18 Apr. 2011. This article focuses on Fey’s early work at Saturday Night Live and work on a screenplay (which ultimately was produced as the movie “Mean Girls.” I will use this article to explore her role in the male-dominated industry of comedy writing and her tendency to buck the status quo.
 Halperin, Mark, and John Heilemann. "The Uncertain Future of Sarah Palin." Time 175.3 (2010): 42-43. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 12 Apr. 2011. This article looks at the possibility of Sarah Palin’s participation in the 2012 Presidential election. I plan to use this article to look at her influence on the Republican party and to explore the possibility of her future impact on pop culture as a public icon.
Leland, John. Hip: The History. New York: HarperCollins, 2004. Print. This book analyzes the history of the evolution of American pop culture and provides the basis for a definition of “hip”.  Mr. Leland serves as a reliable source due to his history of writing about pop culture, and the exhaustive notes and index included with the book are indicative that this work is based on solid research and not merely opinion. I plan to use extensive quotes from this book to establish my personal definition of hip for this essay.
“Oprah Talks to Tina Fey” O, The Oprah Magazine. Harpo Productions. February 2009. Web. 18 April, 2011. In this interview article, Oprah and Tina discuss her role as the first female head writer for Saturday Night Live and the show’s misogynistic past. I will tie this in to the misogyny seen in “hip”. I will also use information from this article to discuss Tina’s background and education and detail the different ways she has expressed her identity and roles.
Palin, Sarah. America By Heart: Reflecctions on Family, Faith, and Flag. New York: HarperCollins, 2010. Print. In this book Sarah Palin discusses her values in light of American history, recent events, and our culture. I will use this book to look at the values that drive her actions, which in turn should help me forecast her future course in politics and pop culture.
---. Going Rogue: An American Life. New York: HarperCollins, 2009. Print. This book is Sarah Palin’s memoir, written and published shortly after the 2008 election. It details her early life and education, her entrance into politics, and her experiences as a highly-public working mother. This book will help me define her as a woman who bucks the status quo on many different levels, as well as providing information on the various reinventions of self she has undergone over the course of her life and career.
Traister, Rebecca. Big Girls Don’t Cry: The Election That Changed Everything for American Women. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010. Print. This book contains a chapter that details Tina Fey’s Saturday Night Live impressions of Sarah Palin, along with other pop culture parodies that impacted the 2008 election. I will use this to look at the impact of pop culture, specifically political satire as trickterism as a mechanism for shaping public opinion and political matters.
Westfall, Sandra Sobieraj. "The Palins Get Real." People 74.19 (2010): 56-61. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 12 Apr. 2011. This article looks at the Palin family and their recent entrance into reality tv. I plan to use a quote from this article to talk about Sarah Palin’s view on having the opportunity to influence the thinking of others.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Women have hips, but somehow it's not enough

            “That whole obsession with hip is like collecting records or whatever. It’s more of a male thing.”
– Kim Gordon



            Hip, as I’ve defined it this semester, is gender-blind. If hip is the reinvention of self as an expression of individuality, without regard to the past or the future, and involving knowledge or awareness not common to all, then anyone can be hip. Regardless of race. Regardless of political party affiliation. Regardless of religious beliefs. Regardless of gender.

It is interesting to me that John Leland chose to devote a whole chapter to women in his book, Hip: The History, just to say that women play a minor or side role, while at the same time declaring that hip is more feminine than masculine. Huh? 

            Perhaps this is just one more way of exploring the contradictions of hip, and the blurring of lines between different things. Certainly, in many ways, there are more differences between the genders than there could possibly be between races.

            Case in point: our discussion on the differences between men and women in ability to simply walk away from their offspring, and so cut themselves off from both past action and future consequence.

            In looking at “hip” as the creative force of popular culture, and asking the question “Is Hip indeed a sexist, misogynistic, male-dominated playground, or is there more to Hip than that?” I agree with the viewpoint that was expressed in class that since Hip is a reflection of popular culture, and our American culture has historically been male-dominated (with related complications of sexism and misogynism), Hip can’t help but reflect those influences.

            I think Kim Gordon’s answer to the question of hip is the perfect reply. She is basically saying, “I’m a woman and I don’t even care if all these men are focused on what is hip. It does not have any bearing on me.”

Monday, April 11, 2011

The hook of hip and a look towards the future

Our discussion in class on Thursday was interesting. Sort of. I think the most interesting thing about it was the conclusion that maybe John Leland just wanted to write a book about race relations in the history of America but needed a “hook” to get people to read his ramblings. So, he entitled his book Hip: The History and led his prospective audience to believe he was writing about popular culture. What a trickster!



 And now we draw the semester to a close by projecting hip ten years or more into The Future. So, I guess the question in my mind is should I pursue the idea of “hip” as a representation of popular culture? Or should I follow Leland’s lead and project race relations 10 years from now?  Urgh. Maybe the biggest question of all is will I be able to escape my past and reinvent myself as an idividual who never thinks about "hip" again?

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Cartoons and Race in America

I have watched a lot of cartoons in my lifetime. I grew up in an era when Saturday mornings were cartoon time. As in, we did not have access to animation 24-hours a day, seven days a week, as I know many of my classmates in this English class (and my own children) did. We watched Daffy Duck, Bugs Bunny, The Roadrunner, Mighty Mouse, and Super Chicken. We also watched a lot of Disney. Never once did we see that we were being exposed to racism in our Saturday morning entertainment.


Maybe that’s because the heart of cartoons is the art form of caricature. Merriam-Webster has this to say about caricature:


1car·i·ca·ture noun
\ˈker-i-kÉ™-ËŒchu̇r, -ËŒchÉ™r, -ËŒtyu̇r, -ËŒtu̇r, -ˈka-ri-\
Definition of CARICATURE
1: exaggeration by means of often ludicrous distortion of parts or characteristics
2: a representation especially in literature or art that has the qualities of caricature
3: a distortion so gross as to seem like caricature
(Dictionary and Thesaurus)
Caricature is, by its very nature, exaggerative and distortional. It is not a picture of life as it is, but rather life skewed to the ridiculous. I guess I have a hard time finding the insult in something I know is not intended to be a portrait of life as it is or life as it ought to be, but rather is a portrait of life distorted.

In an attempt to meet the expectations for this blog assignment, I watched all the cartoons posted on Blackboard and decided to take a careful look at “All This and Rabbit Stew”. This cartoon features a hunter who is a black man, portrayed as a bumbling “sucker”, who is hunting Bugs Bunny. Taken by itself, it is easy to point out specifics in the cartoon, such as the physical characteristics of the hunter that seem to almost play on minstrel blackface, or the end of the cartoon where the hunter is distracted by the opportunity to play at a game of dice rather than continuing to hunt his prey, and cry “Racial prejudice foul!”

On the other hand, when looking at the cartoon listed on Blackboard simply as “Bugs Bunny”, where once again, Bugs is being hunted, again by a bumbling character, this time a white Mountie with a speech impediment, the viewer is less inclined to want to raise a cry of “Foul!” (Unless you have a pronounced lisp – then you might take offense at the character of Elmer Fudd.)

Why is that? Maybe it is simply the perspective of sensitivity. I think that perhaps, at the time these cartoons were created, people were less sensitive to issues of race than we are now, having had the benefit of the Civil Rights Movement in our history.



Works Cited


Dictionary and Thesaurus - Merriam-Webster Online. 2011. Web. 06 Apr. 2011. <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/caricature>.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

A couple more random thoughts about Bamboozled

·         It was very interesting to me that in the movie, Bamboozled, there were only three white characters prominent enough in the story to merit names and 2/3 of them believed they were black and the other 1/3 of them had made it their life’s work to become an “expert” on being black.

·         If the takeaway from this movie is that race is an essential element of each individual, therefore not subject to changing no matter how that person may wish to reinvent themselves, then the conclusion we have to draw is that reinvention can only apply to behavior. You can not control WHO you are; you can only control HOW you act.

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Whole Lotta Trickery Goin On!

If a person watched only the first half of Bamboozled, they would probably come away from that experience convinced that Pierre Delacroix was the trickster. He manipulates his situation by creating a minstrel show, Mantan: The New Millennium Minstrel Show, as a way of trying to get one over on his boss and the network he works for, in order to get fired which would release him from his contractual obligation to the network.


In doing this, he appears to display many of the attributes of the trickster: He undermines the unspoken rules of the culture with regard to race. He pits his intelligence and wit against his racist white boss, who holds the power in the situation. He seeks to enlighten the masses with his show, expecting the audience to respond with outrage. Certainly, he creates chaos, as depicted in the scene where the Reverend Al Sharpton and Johnnie Cochran lead protests against the show. He plays on long-held stereotypes and assumptions of the audience (though he makes the mistake of believing that the audience didn’t really subscribe to those stereotypes).

Had the film ended with Pierre’s dismissal from the network known as “CNS”, and his landing a writing job with another network, where his efforts to launch a new show that would cast black people as intelligent, positive role models, we would all applaud his skill as the trickster in getting over on the folks at CNS. But somewhere along the line, Pierre’s efforts at playing the trickster went horribly wrong, and the situation spirals completely out of his control. He ends up dead, and so do several other characters.

Maybe the real trickster in this film is Pierre’s assistant, Sloan. After all, she is the only one who went into the creation of the show with her eyes wide open, and unlike Pierre, she was able to still keep that focus, even after the show was a success instead of resulting in Pierre’s dismissal.

On the other hand, maybe the racially-insensitive boss, Thomas Dunwitty, is the real trickster. He is, in the end, just about the only character in the movie who has not suffered some sort of loss by the end of the film. In fact, it’s not a far stretch to imagine that for him, life goes on as usual after the deaths of both his writer and his former star, as he viewed their talents as “nothing special” and easily replaced.

If this movie is considered a modern commentary on the trickster figure, I think the message is that you’d better be careful when you set out to play the trickster because things may not turn out the way you foresee and your trickery may backfire on you. Then the joke is on you.




Monday, March 14, 2011

Annotated Bibliography for Essay 2

Brenda Forrey
English 201
Instructor: Scott Weaver
Annotated Bibliography Essay 2
14 March 2011


Annotated Bibliography

Catch Me If You Can. Dir. Stephen Spielberg. Perf. Leonardo DiCaprio, Tom Hanks, Martin Sheen, Christopher Walken. Dreamworks Video. 2003. DVD. This movie details the life and crimes of Frank Abagnale, Jr., who swindled millions of dollars from unsuspecting corporations by the time he was nineteen years old by posing as an airline pilot, a doctor, an attorney and a prosecutor, and perpetrating check fraud schemes. I may use this movie as one of my literary texts to compare to my definition of “hip”.
 Chandler, Raymond. “Red Wind.”  Stories and Early Novels. Ed. Frank McShane. New York: Literary Classics of the United States. 1995. 368-417. Print. This is a short story about a private detective who witnesses a murder, becomes involved with the woman the murder victim was supposed to be meeting, and ends up a target of the perpetrator of the crime. He ultimately solves the mystery surrounding the murder and recovers a string of pearls belonging to the woman that the murder victim was using to blackmail her. This story is one of the literary texts I will be analyzing in this essay.
 Hemmingway, Earnest. “The Killers.”  Scribd. Scribd., Inc. n.d. Web. 11 March 2011. This is a short story set in the early 20th century about a pair of killers who visit a small town diner in search of their mark. It is one of the literary texts I will analyze in this essay to see how it lines up with my definition of “hip”.
Leland, John.  Hip: The History.  New York: HarperCollins, 2004. Print. This book analyzes the history of the evolution of American pop culture and provides the basis for a definition of “hip”.  Mr. Leland serves as a reliable source due to his history of writing about pop culture, and the exhaustive notes and index included with the book are indicative that this work is based on solid research and not merely opinion. I plan to use extensive quotes from this book to establish my personal definition of hip for this essay. This definition, in turn, will be the structure for analyzing the literary texts I’m looking at to determine the “hipness” factor associated with each.
Ray. Dir. Taylor Hackford. Perf. Jamie Foxx, Regina King, Kerry Washington. Universal Studios. 2005. DVD. This movie details the life and musical career of Ray Charles.  This source may serve as a text for the purposes of this paper.  I plan to analyze this movie to see how it compares with my definition of “hip.”
The Confidence Man. LOST: The Complete First Season. By J.J. Abrams, Jeffrey Lieber, Damon Lindelof. Perf. Matthew Fox, Josh Holloway, Evangeline Lilly, Dominic Monaghan, Terry O’Quinn. Buena Vista Home Entertainment. 2005. DVD. Disc 2. This episode sheds light into the character known as Sawyer, how dealings with a confidence man destroyed his family and how he became a confidence man himself.  This source may serve as a text for the purposes of this paper.  I plan to analyze this episode to see how it lines up with my definition of “hip.”

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

On Catching a Trickster

If you can con millions of dollars by the time you are nineteen years old by posing as a pilot, a doctor, an attorney and a prosecutor, you just may be a trickster. Such was the case of Frank Abagnale, Jr., upon whose life-escapades the movie, Catch Me If You Can, was based.


Now, what, specifically made Mr. Abagnale, Jr. a trickster?

·         He undermined the rules of the culture. “Rules of the culture” could be another way of saying “Laws.” Most of Frank’s money gathering depended on his ability to forge checks and impersonate certified professionals. Highly illegal activities.
·         He worked alone. He was not part of a group and didn’t associate with a clique in his trickster activities.
·         He used wit and ingenuity to win. His cons were not based on physical strength; rather they had their genesis in being smart and creative enough to conceive of and execute actions that moved him toward his goal of amassing wealth through illegal means.
·         He used language as power. Frank Abagnale, Jr. was a slick fast-talker. He used his gift of gab to convince people that he had received professional certifications, which in turn, gave him a platform from which to launch his check fraud schemes.
·         He brought enlightenment to the masses. Not willingly, and not at first, but eventually, as a way to serve part of his sentence, he ended up working in the check fraud unit of the FBI, helping these federal agents shut down other check fraud criminals.
·         He crossed boundaries while undermining them. This man was all about breaking the law, and yet, there is something about the brilliance of his crimes that demands respect from law- abiding citizens and even the FBI check fraud unit. Regardless of personal scruples that keep most people well within the bounds of the law, his cleverness opens the door to imagining perpetrating similar schemes and so escaping the restrictions we allow our society to impose upon us.

“Where most criminals try to leave no evidence, the con artist builds a monument to his creativity and wit.” —John Leland (170).


I wonder if having your life story immortalized in both written and film form qualifies as a monument?

Monday, March 7, 2011

Finding Ray

Poor Mr. Charles.

 As we look towards the bright and shining future that includes a hip dissection of a few literary works, my thoughts have turned to Ray Charles. He hardly gets a mention in John Leland's book, Hip, The History. I wonder why that is. I am contemplating using the movie "Ray", which is based on the life and career of Ray Charles, as one of my literary texts for this essay.

Now I wonder if I am on the right track. . . . hmmm. I think Ray Charles probably was hip. I just wonder why Leland only mentions him peripherally. Maybe he's one of those people that Leland indicated in his preface "fell through one of the many holes in this book" (1).

Well, I'm going to see if I can find him as I look through the lenses of my "hip" goggles. 

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Perfection of Imperfection - is this a win/win or a lose/lose?

            Looking at the two qualities that Leland attributes to the Beat generation artists, the “aesthetic of imperfection” (140) and the “license of living in the present tense” (155) and trying to sort out the influence of one on the other is a little like trying to solve the age-old question of “Which came first, the chicken or the egg?” They are interminably intertwined and co-dependent upon one another.
             One has to wonder if the Beats would have so readily embraced the idea of putting their most imperfect work on display if they had not simultaneously exercised the license of living in the present tense. If there is no future, consequences for past mistakes will never have the opportunity to wreak their havoc. If the consequences will never come to fruition, there is no need to worry about the imperfections that would have spawned them. It’s either a win/win proposition or a lose/lose proposition but so long as the future doesn’t really exist, who really cares? By embracing the idea of the eternal present the Beats erased the threat that putting their mistakes on display would have posed to the time-bound mortal.
            I don’t believe that art is an act that necessarily must strive for perfection. That is what mathematics is for. Or engineering. It is the imperfections in art that allow the audience to see that the product is created by human minds and hands, and the flaws can serve to inspire the creative genious of the audience. Just like when you go to the movies to see a film such as Inception and you leave the theater puzzling over the loose ends of the threads that weren’t quite neatly tied up by the film’s end; these imperfections allow you to insinuate your own ideas into the art and perpetuate the creative process.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Fitting a square peg in a hip hole

Our first essay assignment was to write about the hippest person we personally know. No one came immediately to mind. Over the course of several days, I finally decided to write about someone very close to me. Though on the surface, he does not fit the stereotype of a “hip” person (what IS that, anyway?), I do think he has qualities that fit the definition of hip when looked at through the lenses of reinvention and self-expression. Mostly though, I felt this assignment was very much like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. . . not easy and kind of messy.

What follows is my first essay in its entirety. It is very long and not in a format that is very web-friendly; it is, after all, an essay and not a blog post. I am not completely satisfied with this product and will most likely refine and revise if given the opportunity. But for the time being, this is how I defined “hip”:

Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, Who’s the Hippest of Them All?
            “Can you see him? Is he there, in the balcony?” The blind girl next to me in the choir routinely had me searching the crowd for her boyfriend—he had elevated being fashionably late to a hip art form. Okay, so she’s not entirely blind, just too vain to wear the glasses that would render her world in crisp outlines, choosing instead to focus on the clearer, nearer images, and depending on the kindness of those around her to describe the fuzzy, shadowy images beyond. It’s a wonder she never killed anyone driving around that way.
I scan the assembled crowd, skimming over the short and overweight and dark-haired, concentrating on finding the young man with the center-parted, perfectly feathered hair the color of wheat ready for harvest. Shorter than some, taller than most, with the broad shoulders and thin hips of a young man well-acquainted with the rigors of the weight room, he cuts an impressive figure when he enters a room. His wool and leather letterman’s jacket, white sailcloth pants and Puma sneakers mark him as an athlete, along with the rest of his circle of friends. Looking for him has become a habit for me. Hip demands an audience, and I am his.
            Months later, the blind girlfriend is out of the picture and I find myself standing on the edge of an outdoor pool, shivering in the chilly June breeze. The Oregon day is deceptively sunny. I am anchored to the spot by the obligation of holding his class ring while he dives into the razor sharp frigidness of the pale green unheated water. He is the only one of a hundred of us who braves the pool. Doing what others only briefly think about doing is what he is all about. The simple request, “Hey, will you hold my ring?” seems pretty straightforward, but it contains ambiguous code which demands, “Notice me!” and implies, “You’re going to spend the rest of your life watching me do things my way.”  His language is hip—studiously cloaking the real message from the outside world.
            He serenades me with a commercial jingle for Dr. Pepper, dancing ahead of me, not caring what those who look on think of his singing and dancing skills. He will never win any fine arts competition, but he steals my heart by refusing to take himself too seriously. Eventually, we find ourselves in a candlelit church and with the exchange of rings and the simple words, “I do,” he is transformed from the carefree boy who sings, “I’m a Pepper, you’re a Pepper, he’s a Pepper, she’s a Pepper. Wouldn’t you like to be a Pepper, too?”  Who is he now? He is about to find out.
            He brings his firstborn son home. He will do nothing for the next twenty years without considering the impact on this one. This birth (and the two that come later) is the catalyst for multiple reinventions of the man. The first comes within the year.
            He announces he is going to go back to school. He cannot bear the thought of assuming the family carpet cleaning business. He is husband/father/student. Every role defines him, and he is true to himself in excelling at every one. A marginal student in high school, he distinguishes himself by earning a place in the University’s Academic Hall of Fame. He gently breaks the news to his own father that he has chosen a different path. He will not be a carpet cleaner. He will not embrace the status quo. He will be his own man. The family business will be no more.
He finds that the work he does occupies time and provides for his family, but it is not who he is. Honors and promotions stoke his ego and ease financial burdens, but they do not complete him. He looks for ways to honor the essence of who he is and finds that coaching his kids’ sports teams gives him the opportunity he craves to develop knowledge and share it with a select few. He becomes not a businessman who coaches in his spare time; rather he is a coach who finds time to be a businessman. “This goes towards my ‘dad of the year’ award, right?” becomes a frequent refrain. I know what he means. It’s not really about being the best coach; it’s about being the best dad.
He knows something the other baseball coaches do not know: you can take a ragtag bunch of mediocre players and form them into a winning team, not by depending on their skill or perfect mechanics, but by strategizing the plays. He wins countless games against superior teams with this knowledge. I watch him call plays from the third base line with a combination of signals and code phrases he taught to his players. It is a thing of beauty to those who know the code and a source of frustration to those who have yet to crack it. Who would have ever guessed that America’s favorite pastime could be so hip?
“Dude! We were like truckin’ dude down that hill, dude, like so fast, Dude! I mean, dude, it was, dude, unreal! DUDE!” The boy’s verbal skills were neatly matched by his social skills. The man laughingly counted “dpm’s” and growled “Kris—go home!” when he overstayed his welcome. But when the troubled kid who had no father was kicked out of the house by his overwhelmed mother, this man took him in. He showed the kid how to consider his options, make a clean break with his past, see potential in himself. By the time the boy returned to his mother’s home, the “dudes per minute” count and growled phrases about going home had worked their magic, communicating love and acceptance to one who had experienced very little of that. He doesn’t just talk the talk of helping others, he walks the walk. Other people don’t understand this. Sometimes being this hip is hard.
He wants a cabin. He dreams of mountains, and logs, and heavy equipment. It must be a remote place, built with his own hands. He will be a cabin builder, and his creation will be an extension of who he is. It would be much easier to buy one that already exists, but that would be at odds with his purposes in pursuing this dream. In pouring concrete, and stacking logs, and installing windows, and dealing with building inspectors and all the other minutiae of a project of this magnitude, he is afforded the opportunity to once again gain knowledge that only a select few have, and also to interminably suspend himself in the present time. Once the project is begun, there is no turning back. The pace of the project, coupled with the painstaking process of learning as he goes along, seem to ensure that the future of “when the cabin is complete” will never arrive. Being thoroughly comfortable living in the present, enjoying the process instead of demanding the resolution, is hip. When he puts on his “man pants” and retreats to “man land” he is on the road he calls “living the dream”. It is as though Walt Whitman was speaking directly to his soul in his poem Song of Myself when he penned, “Not I—not any one else, can travel that road for you, / You must travel it for yourself. /  It is not far—it is within reach; / Perhaps you have been on it since you were born, and did not know; / Perhaps it is every where on water and on land” (46.1207-1211). Dreaming the dream is commonplace; living the dream is hip.
His name is Randy, and he is the one person in my life that most closely personifies this maddeningly ambiguous term we are studying this semester, called “hip”.
If “hip” is the reinvention of self as an expression of individualism without regard for the past or the future, then Randy is the picture of hip. In his book, Hip: The History, John Leland argues, “This promise of reinvention—that we are not bound by our pasts—is a core current of hip” (31). He goes on to say that it was “the gospel of individualism that was central to hipsters to come” (Leland 44). When you have reinvention married to the expression of individualism, you get hip. Reinvention in the absence of the expression of individualism is just copycat-ism. Over the course of many years, I have seen varied incarnations of Randy: carefree youth, faithful spouse, father, student, coach, businessman, mentor, dreamer, builder.  It’s not so much the fact that he has been called on to fulfill different roles that makes him hip—lots of people do that. His hipness is born of the intensity and focus with which he dedicates himself to his various roles and his ability to live in the moment. He doesn’t just complete the actions; he becomes what he does. When Leland says, “hip germinated in the off hours” (p 46), he paints a picture of a person who indulges their true identity in the hours spent away from the world of work. Randy may be a businessman by occupation, but he finds his identity in being a husband, father, coach, mentor, dreamer and builder. Business is what he does; the other things are what he is.
Hip involves knowledge and awareness not commonly held, though shared by some within an exclusive circle. According to John Leland, “[hip’s] rejection of conventional wisdom is a reflection on convention, not wisdom” (49). He goes on to say that “enlightenment involves stripping away sophistication, not adding to it” (Leland 49). Randy demonstrated both of these ideas in his approach to baseball, rejecting some more conventional approaches to coaching, but embracing wisdom that allowed him to put the special knowledge he had attained to his best advantage, all while keeping it as much about the basics as possible. The exclusive circle within which he shared his special knowledge was the team he was coaching at the time, and assistant coaches he was mentoring.
Paired with this “knowing” or enlightenment is the invention of slang terms or the use of language to mean something other than the definition dictated by the dictionary. The language of hip involves both humor and ambiguity and according to John Leland, “verbal riffing wants an audience that doesn’t get it as much as one that does” (24). When Randy first grinned and casually said to me, “That’s about 40 dpm’s”, the reference to the oft-repeated word sailed completely over Kris’s head.  Eventually, Kris decoded that message, and it became a favorite joke within our family. Though most people would be offended by having “Kris–go home!” growled in their faces, our friend came to understand that that particular message included an invitation to return another time. Hip language serves a dual purpose: to communicate with those who are “in the know,” as well as to exclude those who are “out of it.”
So, can anybody be hip? Or is hipness limited to a select segment of the population?  Leland contends that hip is the territory of young people because “they have the least invested in the status quo” (22) and that while embracing new technology is easily done by the young, older people are more likely to resist change and “get corny” (61). This is where Leland and I part company. I don’t believe that hipness is tied to a particular age group; it is more closely tied to state of mind than state of body. As a matter of fact, I would argue that if it is hip to reinvent oneself as an expression of individual identity, then the older a person is and the more entrenched they are in the status quo, the greater the impact of a total re-make of identity. Perhaps the potential for hipness actually increases with age.
            Just when you think you have a handle on hip, you find you don’t. It defies concrete definition and dwells in a place of subjectivity.  Probably, the soul group, Tower of Power, said it best in their 1973 song called “What is Hip?” when they crooned: “Hipness is—what it is! / And sometimes hipness is / What it ain’t!” (qtd in Leland 4). Hipness is a lifestyle, the essence of the man who is hip. It looks different on each person. Hip is a circular reference that refuses to be resolved into a nice neat package…but you will know it when you see it.
Works Cited
Leland, John. Hip: The History.
             New York: HarperCollins, 2004.   Print.
Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Philadelphia: David McKay, 1900. N. Pag. Bartleby.com, 1999. Web. 18 February 2011.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Hip socket

This is a nod to my friend who thought I should blog about a hip socket.

It is President's Day, and I have finished my paper on the hippest person I know. I have studied for tests and quizzes that shall be administered tomorrow (what a big day!) and am rewarding myself with a trip to Bogus Basin. Maybe you will catch a glimpse of me on one of the webcams if you click on this link: http://www.bogusbasin.org/web-cameras/index.aspx  I will be the one bundled from head to toe. I think it's hip to stay warm.

I hope I don't get so caught up in ruminating on the hipness factor of everyone I see that I crash and burn and hurt my hip socket.

(There, Shelly, are you happy now?!?!?!)

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Los Angeles beat to a bloody pulp

Los Angeles is the setting for most pulp fiction stories and film noir creations because it didn’t have a long history to anchor it to reality. In truth, it was an ugly spot in the desert, but through creative invention of history, money of rich real estate investors who were able to bring necessities of modern life like water and the railroad, and slick advertising via the power of the press, it was transformed.  Hip begs for reinvention and LA was an empty canvas ready to be filled.

Los Angeles is the city of broken dreams. People went there all the time to reinvent themselves. Some were successful; many were not. Add to this the fact that the “work” these dreamers performed – becoming someone entirely different with each project they completed – must have seemed nearly a personal affront to the hard-working all-American male factory-worker pulp fiction audience. How dare they go play on a stage and call that work?!?! 

The genre of pulp fiction seized on the disillusionment that was so much a part of LA dreams and pointed out that even though the city might be a place for dreams to come true, it was just as likely to disappoint. By painting it as a dark, sinister place, the authors seem to be saying that it is not just actors and actresses who can be reinvented with each character they play, but the backdrop itself can be reinvented to become something that seems out of character at first glance with what is expected.

By taking the pretty face of Los Angeles and beating it to a pulp by portraying it as ugly, violent and dangerous, pulp fiction writers and film noir creators made the city itself a character.  Which is really hip . . . what should have served as a setting instead was reinvented as a character.  If that’s not hip, what is?        

Monday, February 14, 2011

Identity, Time, Knowledge and Hemingway

What's the connection between Hip and Hemingway?

IDENTITY, Time, Knowledge. This is the stuff that keeps me awake at night. (I have now identified the cause of my insomnia-du-jour). Identity, TIME, Knowledge. It's 3:23 a.m. and I'm wrestling with The Killers instead of gently dreaming like the rest of the family. Identity, Time, KNOWLEDGE. Might as well just get up.

IDENTITY
Hemingway seems bent on confusing his reader with his cast of characters. The identities of Al and Sam are anchored by references to their race and only Nick Adams and Ole Anderson have the distinction of both a first and last name. If people find
their identity in their occupation, then George, and Sam and Mrs. Bell are the only three with true identities in the story. Al and Max indicate they are killers, but since they never actually kill anyone during this narrative, maybe they are just wannabe's.

TIME
Three things about time are certain in this story. It is evening as the story opens. The killers spend approximately 2 hours in Henry's lunch room, as marked by the march of the clock. The season is the fall. In the character of Ole Anderson, Hemingway seems to contradict the "hip" concept of a perpetual present in that Ole's PAST has followed him to the PRESENT, and consequently, his FUTURE has already been determined.

KNOWLEDGE
If knowledge is power, then Ole Anderson is king in this story. He is the only character that seems to know all the pieces of the puzzle. He knows what time to go to Henry's to eat the dinner. He knows what it is about his past that has made him a target. He knows the police can't help him, it won't do any good to keep running, and that the threat to his life is not a bluff. He knows his future date with a bullet is a certainty.

So there you have it. It's 5:04 a.m. and I am SO DONE thinking about Hemingway and the hipness of his little story. Time to make the coffee and get on with the day.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Hip and the City

Could hip have happened without the urbanization of America? Leland indicates that the “protective anonymity” of the city allowed people to act in ways and put forth ideas that would not be accepted in rural areas or that could get one into trouble with their parents, spouses or clergy.  He maintains that the density of city population ensured that ideas put forth in a book or play that “shocked mainstream sensibilities could find a constituency in a city, spark debate, and beget even more radical works; in a small town it would just be weird.” (p. 63) Hip finds its genesis and acceptance with a crowd.

Leland argues strongly for the necessity of the city in the creation of hip when he says, “In practice hip needs this constant exposure to the larger group; if no one is looking it isn’t really hip.” (p. 70) Hip demands an audience to flourish; with no audience it withers and dies. It’s kind of like the question, “If a man unloads the dishwasher but nobody sees him do it, does it really count?”  Hip ideas, hip fashion, hip art: without an audience, it’s like talking to yourself, which is as weird as the radical ideas that spring up  in a small town.

I think that during the industrialization of America, hip could not possibly have been created in rural or suburban areas.  The city was absolutely necessary as a breeding ground for hip. However, with the advances of technology, specifically the World Wide Web, the dependence of hip on urbanization is minimized. The internet is the new city, providing cover for marginal or radical ideas, as well as anonymity and protection for the person putting forth the ideas while simultaneously providing the largest stage imaginable.  This means that a person in Kuna, ID and a person in New York City have equal opportunity via the internet to broadcast ideas and meet with like-minded people.

Our world is no longer neatly divided into “urban” and “rural” from the perspective of how ideas, and art, and trends are communicated. Therefore, though hip may have required the city in order to be created, the city no longer plays such a critical role in the ongoing evolution of hip.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Hip circles

What do you call a person who outwardly rejects everything mainstream but conforms when no one is looking?  A hipocrit.

So . . . . I'm more than a little concerned about our first essay assignment. Hip. Not a concept I really concerned myself with prior to the beginning of this semester. Now I find my mind circling hip and creating: 

Hiperocity  Hipalicious  Hiptitious  Hiptification
Hipsessed  Hipified  Hipicious  Hipstraneous
Hiptionary  Hipical  Hiperized  Hipsy
Hipsterical  Hip and run  Hipicide
Hippity-do-da!


 Attaching this idea of "hip" to someone in my life is a challenge that has me more than just a little befuzzled. I think about the people I know and can't think of a single one who resembles the concept as we've discussed it in class. 

I guess I don't run in "hip" circles.  Hip circles. Sounds like something you'd do in a Zumba class.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Instruction Manual for Life

This is what you shall do:

Begin with the end in mind, never sacrifice the long-term goal for the short-term good, live within your means, never cease to look for excellence in others, celebrate small victories, never mistake quantity for quality, seek to understand the viewpoints of others before asking them to understand yours, never fail to learn from the mistakes of others, realize your potential, never take yourself too seriously, make wise choices, never remain angry when it is within your power to do otherwise, laugh until tears run off your face and your collarbones ache.


Value people above objects, and the experience of those who have gone before you. Treasure the gift of time spent with those you love. Value integrity. Love the truth. Cherish a goal attained. Revere the sacrifices others have made to enable you to enjoy the life you have. Prize good health and a sound mind. Value the love that others offer to you. Appreciate the person upon whom you can depend.


Scorn those who promote evil. Look with disdain upon intentional rudeness, malicious destruction, selfish ambition and persistent stupidity. Refuse to associate with those hellbent on the ruination of themselves and others. Scorn those who are wasteful of natural resources or their own talents.


Question inconsistencies in religious teachings and the abilities of those in political power to make sound fiscal decisions. Examine an educational system that insists that all students are equally able to succeed. Question the skew on the information relayed by the media. Be skeptical about the wisdom of tattoos and piercings in light of their permanency. Question the acceptance as “normal” things that were once considered deviant. Check the inclination to see the grass as being greener on the other side of the fence.


Love justice, extend mercy and grace to those who don’t deserve it.
Count the cost of any project you undertake in terms of money, effort, and passion required to bring it to completion before you begin. Surround yourself with people who expect the best from you. If your conscience whispers that you probably shouldn’t do something, run from that action. Heed these words and when your bones lie dry and dusty in your grave, you will have made a mark on this world that is worthy of no regret.